Skip to content

George

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    George supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    George supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    George supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    George shared this idea  · 
  5. 1,022 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    George commented  · 

    While split tunneling is really a great idea, for my purposes it makes much more sense to reverse it to lauch proframs from the area that you DO NOT WANt going through the VPN. With all the latest security measures, a user goes through hell when a program like MS Outlook tries to connect to a Gmail or Yahoo server from a new country. Personally, I would prefer to be able to make a program an EXCEPTION to going through the VPN. I wonder if others would feel the same?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    George commented  · 

    Suggestion: Provide an option in settinjg to start PureVPN minimized to Notification area.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    George commented  · 

    I have sent similar feedback before. It is just that every time I nned to chat with Tech support, it never ceases to amaze me how BAD my experience is!

    I am not a novice to VPN's and only request additional info on, usually, advanced question, but these guys are CLUELESS. Recently, I asked, wich was bettrer for filesaharing, UDP or TCP protocol? Their answer: you can connect to either! I KNOW that! I asked for an expert opinion, and they give me THAT answer. When I asked AGAIN, which one was better for my purpose, their answer: they are the SAME! There is nothing that is the same about then except they are transfer protocols!

    I have had similar experience EVERYTIME I have to ask a question.

    I would NEVER recommend PureVPN to ANYONE that needs ANY kind of assistance, except for maybe a setup. If you need anything beyond their scripts, tech support is useless! So the ONLY people I would recommend your service to would be people whp will never need tech supporft!

    And I am really still frustrated about the Windows 64 bit client not being able to auto-connect on bootup. When is THAT going to be fixed? It has been over 6 weeks that I know of that it has not functioned.

    On a positive note, I love your speeds and the fact I get no NAT conflicts with my P2P program, although that scares me a bit since my P2P program specifically says that I SHOULD get NAT conflicts while using a VPN. Makes me wonder if PureVPN is truily secure and anonymous.

Feedback and Knowledge Base